Section 7 of plan-2026-08-06-card-subsystem.md listed these and they were never
applied, so the stale text kept misleading readers — it already cost this project
a ten-row itemState table.
CARD_SYSTEM.md:
- "STILL UNKNOWN, AND NOT GUESSED" is ANSWERED. Its candidate set was wrong:
it asked which of 0x1e/0x1f/0x91..0x96 meant kit/badge/stadium, but three of
the five families are cardtype 7 (kit 9, stadium 10, badge 11) and are not in
that set at all, and 0x91..0x96 are trophies. Replaced with the settled map
and how each family's caption resolves.
- itemState table starts at 0x180229cc0, not 0x180229d20 — the recorded address
points MID-table, which is why six rows were missing. Added that
WAITING_FOR_GAME/inGame are aliases, that omitting the key yields invalid and
not free, and that the match is case-sensitive (measured).
- the consumables route claim "the /consumables/%s template ... the client has
still never used" is false; it IS that template, with base index 3 = ut/%s/club.
- added the dated field-map correction block, extended with the +0x60 and
definitionId findings measured on 2026-08-21.
tools/fut_store.py: the discard_value premise "that lookup returns no row for our
cards" / "WHY its lookup misses is still UNKNOWN" is false — it does not miss, the
tile reads a different property. That story sent one round of work chasing a table
defect that never existed.
funman300
22cfae830f