feat(fifa17): manager contracts, from a Core-owned staff tier

ROOT CAUSE, one line. openfut-import-fifa17 emitted `"overall": 0` for every
non-player Core definition while `d.rating` already held EA's authoritative
`value` -- and the very next block wrote that same number correctly to the
adapter catalog. So the tier existed host-side but never reached Core:
Core overall 0 -> /collection effective_overall 0 -> CoreOwnedItem.rating 0 ->
tier_for_rating(0) = Bronze for a Gold (88) manager. That silent mis-grant is
exactly what the 409 was protecting against, so the refusal was correct.

The emitter now also writes `source_rating`, keeping `overall` at 0. Regenerating
the production pack changes exactly 18 entries and exactly one field each
(source_rating None -> value); same 1710 ids, same fingerprint 28c333f1e833338a.

WHY value IS the tier source, and why the thresholds are the player ladder:
LIVE_PROVEN, not inferred. The client re-rates staff from its own
managercards/*coachcards/physiocards by carddbid and applies discard_level's
65/75 ladder; coach_probe/discard_probe agree 4/4 (manager value 88 -> level 3,
coaches 66 -> level 2). The shipped coach tables corroborate: each family has
exactly 3 tiers x 2 rarities, and only 65/75 splits them 2/2/2.

Manager contracts stop refusing and now resolve the TARGET's tier from
Core-owned state. Still fail-closed everywhere it matters: a coach or physio is
`contract_target_not_a_manager` (only cardsubtypeid 4 is a manager), and a
manager Core carries no source_rating for is `manager_tier_unknown` rather than
a guessed tier. Core's own content_kind token is sent as target_kind, because
Core calls the squad manager `manager` while the catalog classifies it
`staff`+subtype 4.

NOT implemented, unchanged: STORED_MANAGER_BONUS and MATCH_CONTRACT_DECREMENT.

openfut-adapter-fifa17/src/fut/club_response.rs

@@ -159,6 +159,8 @@ mod tests {
             // Untracked by default, so these fixtures exercise the pack-fresh
             // fallback; a test that cares sets it explicitly.
             contract_matches: None,
+            source_rating: None,
+            core_content_kind: None,
         }
     }
 

openfut-adapter-fifa17/src/fut/contract_cards.rs

@@ -37,12 +37,12 @@
 //! ## Family gating
 //!
 //! [`PLAYER_CONTRACT_SUBTYPE`] (201) applies to PLAYERS only and
-//! [`MANAGER_CONTRACT_SUBTYPE`] (202) to MANAGERS/STAFF only. 202 cannot be
-//! honoured today for a reason that is a data gap, not a policy: staff ratings
-//! are not imported, so a manager target's tier cannot be determined honestly and
-//! there is no defensible column to read. The caller must REFUSE a 202 apply
-//! rather than default the tier — inventing gold (or bronze, or the card's own
-//! tier) would silently pay out the wrong number with no error anywhere.
+//! [`MANAGER_CONTRACT_SUBTYPE`] (202) to MANAGERS only. A 202 target's tier comes
+//! from [`staff_tier`], whose input is Core's authored definition rating for the
+//! staff card (EA's `value` column). When Core carries none, [`staff_tier`]
+//! answers `None` and the caller must REFUSE the apply — inventing gold (or
+//! bronze, or the card's own tier) would silently pay out the wrong number with
+//! no error anywhere.
 //!
 //! A contract also cannot be applied to a LOAN item. This crate models no loan
 //! state, so that gate — like the 201/202 family check — is the caller's: this
@@ -87,6 +87,16 @@ impl ContractTier {
             ContractTier::Gold => 2,
         }
     }
+
+    /// The tier's lowercase log token. The three names are the game's own tier
+    /// names, so a log line reads the same as the screen.
+    pub const fn as_str(self) -> &'static str {
+        match self {
+            ContractTier::Bronze => "bronze",
+            ContractTier::Silver => "silver",
+            ContractTier::Gold => "gold",
+        }
+    }
 }
 
 /// Card tier from a rating: gold `>= 75`, silver `65..=74`, bronze `< 65`.
@@ -106,6 +116,26 @@ pub fn tier_for_rating(rating: u8) -> ContractTier {
     }
 }
 
+/// Tier of a STAFF target. `None` when Core carries no authoritative value —
+/// the caller MUST fail closed and never substitute a tier.
+///
+/// `source_rating` is EA's authored `value` for the staff definition, i.e. the
+/// number the CLIENT ITSELF re-rates the card to: it merges a staff record from
+/// its own `managercards`/`headcoachcards`/`fitnesscoachcards`/`physiocards`/
+/// `gkcoachcards` table keyed on `carddbid`, ignoring whatever `rating` the
+/// server sent. Core's `overall` is deliberately 0 for a non-player (it feeds
+/// pricing and projection), so `overall` is NOT the tier source and must not be
+/// read as one.
+///
+/// The ladder is [`tier_for_rating`], unchanged and not re-thresholded here:
+/// staff are LIVE-PROVEN to use the SAME ladder as players. `coach_probe.py` and
+/// `discard_probe.py` agree 4/4 against the running client — manager `value` 88
+/// re-rates to discard level 3 (gold) and coaches at `value` 66 to level 2
+/// (silver), exactly as [`super::discard::discard_level`] scores a player.
+pub fn staff_tier(source_rating: Option<u8>) -> Option<ContractTier> {
+    source_rating.map(tier_for_rating)
+}
+
 /// Matches granted by contract consumable `resource_id` against a target of
 /// `tier`.
 ///
@@ -134,8 +164,8 @@ pub const PACK_FRESH_CONTRACT_MATCHES: i64 = 7;
 /// `cardsubtypeid` of a PLAYER contract card. Applies to players only.
 pub const PLAYER_CONTRACT_SUBTYPE: i64 = 201;
 
-/// `cardsubtypeid` of a MANAGER contract card. Applies to managers/staff only,
-/// and is currently unservable — see the module header's family-gating note.
+/// `cardsubtypeid` of a MANAGER contract card. Applies to managers only; the
+/// target's tier comes from [`staff_tier`] over Core's authored staff rating.
 pub const MANAGER_CONTRACT_SUBTYPE: i64 = 202;
 
 #[cfg(test)]
@@ -155,6 +185,42 @@ mod tests {
         assert_eq!(tier_for_rating(99), ContractTier::Gold);
     }
 
+    /// A staff target Core carries no authored rating for has NO tier. `None` is
+    /// what lets the caller refuse; defaulting to bronze would silently under-pay
+    /// a gold manager, and defaulting to gold would over-pay every unknown one.
+    #[test]
+    fn an_unrated_staff_target_has_no_tier() {
+        assert_eq!(staff_tier(None), None);
+    }
+
+    /// Staff read the SAME ladder as players, so the boundaries are the same
+    /// exact 64/65 and 74/75 — `staff_tier` must not re-threshold.
+    #[test]
+    fn staff_tier_boundaries_are_the_player_ladder() {
+        assert_eq!(staff_tier(Some(64)), Some(ContractTier::Bronze));
+        assert_eq!(staff_tier(Some(65)), Some(ContractTier::Silver));
+        assert_eq!(staff_tier(Some(74)), Some(ContractTier::Silver));
+        assert_eq!(staff_tier(Some(75)), Some(ContractTier::Gold));
+        for rating in 0..=99u8 {
+            assert_eq!(
+                staff_tier(Some(rating)),
+                Some(tier_for_rating(rating)),
+                "rating {rating} must not diverge from the shared ladder"
+            );
+        }
+    }
+
+    /// The two values the live client was actually observed re-rating: the
+    /// squad manager at `value` 88 scored discard level 3 (gold) and the coaches
+    /// at `value` 66 scored level 2 (silver), 4/4 across `coach_probe.py` and
+    /// `discard_probe.py`. These are the ONLY staff tiers with live proof, so
+    /// they are pinned here rather than left to the generic boundary test.
+    #[test]
+    fn the_live_probed_staff_values_score_their_observed_tiers() {
+        assert_eq!(staff_tier(Some(88)), Some(ContractTier::Gold), "manager 88");
+        assert_eq!(staff_tier(Some(66)), Some(ContractTier::Silver), "coach 66");
+    }
+
     /// The tier ladder must stay locked to the discard ladder it was taken from:
     /// both index the same three card tiers, and a divergence would mean one of
     /// the two is no longer the client's.

openfut-adapter-fifa17/src/fut/item.rs

@@ -55,6 +55,13 @@ pub struct CoreOwnedItem {
     /// "untracked" rather than seeding a number, so the game-specific default
     /// stays on this side of the boundary.
     pub contract_matches: Option<i64>,
+    /// EA's authored definition rating for a non-player, from Core. `None` = Core
+    /// tracks none; callers MUST fail closed rather than substitute a tier.
+    pub source_rating: Option<u8>,
+    /// Core's own `content_kind` token for this instance, verbatim. Distinct from
+    /// the adapter catalog's kind: Core calls the squad manager `manager` while the
+    /// catalog classifies it `staff` + subtype 4.
+    pub core_content_kind: Option<String>,
 }
 
 /// The FIFA-side numeric identity of an owned item. `asset_id` MUST be a real
@@ -570,6 +577,10 @@ mod tests {
             attributes: [90, 88, 70, 85, 40, 78],
             // Untracked by default; the contract tests below set it explicitly.
             contract_matches: None,
+            // Players: their rating IS `overall`, so Core carries no separate
+            // authored definition rating, and these fixtures are player items.
+            source_rating: None,
+            core_content_kind: None,
         }
     }
 

openfut-adapter-fifa17/src/fut/squad_projection.rs

@@ -299,6 +299,8 @@ mod tests {
             club: "c".into(),
             attributes: [80, 80, 80, 80, 40, 80],
             contract_matches: None,
+            source_rating: None,
+            core_content_kind: None,
         }
     }