Five parallel Ghidra investigations, one adversarial reviewer each, one synthesis.
Kept in the repo because the reviewer corrections are load-bearing: they refuted claims
in four of the five reports, two of which would have shipped wrong behaviour (a
speculative /season body justified by our own curl traffic in the log, and a store
field block that was a freeze rather than a regression).
Carries the next live session (one launch, three flags, four menu actions, one
read-only memory probe), the implementation queue, what is genuinely blocked and why,
and a what-could-make-this-plan-wrong section that names the store change as the
concrete regression risk.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01VUT92pz6RWKih9dSr8ZpxW
funman300
285d4f6cb7