Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
funman300 a4c6aeed49 docs(re): ApplyCardByRes post-ACK protocol is outcome B, live-proven 2026-08-22 01:07:54 +00:00
funman300 97498c560e docs(re): refute the contract:7 effect source; record the competing development reading
Two corrections found while trying to close the effect boundary statically.

1. `contract: 7` IS OUR OWN PLACEHOLDER. fut_store.py:232's generic _item()
   factory -- which builds every item the oracle serves -- hardcodes
   playStyle 250 / contract 7 / fitness 99 on players and consumables alike. The
   staging GK reads back exactly those three constants. So the production
   catalog's contract:7 for resource 5001004 is an oracle placeholder
   round-tripped through an observed profile, not an EA value. Its status is not
   INFERRED, it is KNOWN-BOGUS as a source. Had the effect been implemented on
   it, it would have been a fabricated game rule wearing observed-data clothing.

2. fcc_contractcards is NOT amount-less. An earlier note here claimed it "has no
   amount column, so this value comes from observed data". It has 13 rows with
   gold/silver/bronze/rating, 6 player + 6 manager paired by rating plus a
   99/99/99 special. The sibling fcc_healingcards shares every column except
   that it carries a single `amount`, which argues the differing columns ARE the
   effect payload (per target tier). Against that: the values are non-monotonic
   across tiers, which suits weights better than amounts; and no column of
   5001004 is 7, so neither reading explains the placeholder.

   The reader that would settle amount-vs-weight is in FIFA17.exe, not CardsDLL
   (the table and column literals are absent from the DLL), so this stays
   EFFECT_UNKNOWN rather than being guessed.

Also records, in content_taxonomy.rs, the competing reading of `development`:
fut_consumables.py's TYPE_CATEGORIES groups it as card-categories {6,7,8,9,10}
(modifiers only), explicitly flagged there as inferred from UI-bucket names and
never observed on the wire. Different enum space from the CONSUMABLE_TYPE switch
that actually emits the segment, and the switch gives formation/position/
playStyle/managerLeagueModifier their own segments rather than folding them into
development -- so the unfiltered reading is better supported, but it is still a
reading and the doc now says so instead of sounding settled.

248 adapter tests, fmt clean. No behaviour change.
2026-08-22 01:01:47 +00:00
funman300 9f445904a5 docs(re): record the reversed ApplyCardByRes success contract and the nine-segment consumables vocabulary 2026-08-22 00:50:47 +00:00
funman300 739228efdb feat(host): capture unclaimed request bodies; record the consumable-apply wire
Milestone 2: the consumable-apply protocol is now LIVE_PROVEN.

Adds opt-in passthrough BODY logging (OPENFUT_FIFA17_LOG_PASSTHROUGH_BODY=1,
default off, capped at 512 bytes) because a body is what names an unknown
mutation's operands, while also being the one place a request could carry
something that should not reach a log. Staging probe only.

With it, one operator apply captured the whole thing:

    POST /ut/game/fifa17/item/resource/5001004
    {"apply":[{"id":100000003}]}

  source consumable : resource 5001004 (player contract, subtype 201) -- in the PATH
  target item(s)    : wire 100000003 (squad slot 0 GK, resourceId 200389) -- body apply[]
  verb              : POST

There is NO /apply endpoint, exactly as the static route work concluded. The
apply re-uses `ut/%s/item/resource`, which we already serve for GET (definition
lookup); the POST verb on that path is the mutation and nothing claimed it. This
is the wire form of the ApplyCardByRes task (id 0x0e), which is why the source is
a definition id rather than an instance id. `apply` is an array, so one resource
can name several targets.

Fail-closed verified: with the upstream dead the request 502s and Core is left
exactly unchanged -- coins 29,843,976, owned 1993, consumables 17, source card
still owned. No partial mutation.

NOT implemented: the response shape is unobserved and the EFFECT is unreversed.
Our catalog carries contract:7 for 5001004, documented as the matches granted,
but that is observed profile data (INFERRED), so no effect is written on it.

Bonus, caught by the same logging: the client really does request
`club/consumables/development`, which has no arm in
consumable_families_for_category and is served empty. Recorded, not guessed.

Host 120 lib tests, fmt clean.
2026-08-22 00:23:15 +00:00
funman300 db5fb37980 feat(host): name unclaimed requests, and record the FUT task vocabulary
Milestone 2 groundwork.

The passthrough arm forwarded to Python without ever recording WHAT was asked
for, so on staging -- where the upstream is deliberately dead -- an unhandled
request produced an anonymous 502. It now logs method, path and body length
before forwarding, which is how the next unclaimed route gets identified:

  utas-host owner=PYTHON route=passthrough method=GET path=/ut/... body_len=0

Also records the FUT TASK vocabulary read out of the live client. The client
drives UTAS through named tasks held in a CardsDLL .rdata table of 0x20-byte
MixedCase/UPPERCASE slots, with a .data descriptor table giving each a task id:

  ApplyCard 0x0d, ApplyCardByRes 0x0e, ConsumeCard, ActivateCard, AssingCard(sic),
  MoveCard, MoveCardByRes, SwapCard, DiscardCard, DiscardCardByRes, ViewCards, ...

So consumable application IS a first-class client action even though the route
table contains no /apply endpoint -- it must ride an existing route. The
descriptor's function pointer is a `mov [rip+flag], cl; ret` setter, not a
request builder, so the request is assembled elsewhere keyed by task id; that is
cheaper to answer with one live capture than with more static tracing.

Search tooling carries mandatory positive controls (tradePile, ut/%s/item, squad
-- all FOUND), so the "no /apply route" result is a valid negative rather than a
failed scan.

Host 120 lib tests, fmt and clippy clean.
2026-08-22 00:14:11 +00:00
funman300 fb38ee6087 fifa17: claim five routes whose handlers were already unreachable
Read the client's COMPLETE UTAS route surface out of CardsDLL's .rdata in the
running process (new tools/url_template_probe.py) and probed every one against
staging, where the Python upstream is deliberately dead so anything the Rust host
does not own answers 502 instead of being silently proxied.

That found five routes whose handlers already existed and were dead code because
`classify` never produced their Route -- the same defect as `season/list` and
`watchList`, whose fix comments are still in the file. This is the third and
fourth time:

  captcha        -> handle_static_ack, which already returns the oracle's exact
                    {encodedImg,sequence,sizeBeforeEncode}
  tfa            -> handle_static_ack, {}
  livemessage    -> handle_static_ack, {}
  activeMessage  -> handle_static_ack, {}
  tournament/user-> FeatureOffEmpty, {} == the oracle with FUT_MODES off
                    (tools/utas_server.py:1504); the client builds this literal
                    at CardsDLL 0x18021e540 and the bare `tournament` arm never
                    matched it

Route's own doc comment already claimed the first four as "Rust-owned
UNCONDITIONAL", so the documentation was wrong rather than the intent. All five
are byte-identical to the oracle, so claiming them is parity, not new behaviour.
Invisible in production because the upstream answers there.

Two tests pin the vocabularies so a handler cannot go unreachable a fifth time;
both are mutation-checked (removing the captcha arm fails the first).

Also documents the surface in docs/CLIENT_ROUTE_SURFACE.md, including the trap
that bit me repeatedly: an .rdata literal is a FRAGMENT, not a callable path.
`clientdata`, `purchasegroup`, `sbs/challenges`, `squadBuildingSets`, `club/items`
and `item` all looked unserved and are not. Only `squad/mode` is genuinely
unserved, and correctly so -- it is Draft-only, which is out of scope.

L5 finding: there is NO consumable-apply route anywhere in the binary. The only
owned-item mutations the client can express are PUT item (move/pile), DELETE
item/<id> and POST delete/item (quick sell), and PUT squad. So applying a
consumable is not a dedicated endpoint; L5/L6 must be pursued by capturing the
PUT item payload, not by implementing a route that does not exist.

Host 123 lib + 45 host_test, fmt and clippy clean. tournament/user, livemessage
and activeMessage verified 200 on staging (were 502).
2026-08-21 23:28:29 +00:00