From d4dfdea785725c4277967665a1bacbede1838712 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: bluss <bluss@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 11:46:01 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] nodrop-union: Implement Copy, Clone on NoDrop<T>

Clone is not so important, but Copy is, since it's structural when
implemented, and adding the trait allows more versatile use of
NoDrop<T>.

Only the untagged unions version can implement Copy for NoDrop<T>, since
it truly has no destructor.
---
 nodrop-union/src/lib.rs | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/nodrop-union/src/lib.rs b/nodrop-union/src/lib.rs
index a7fc9e2..94a5061 100644
--- a/nodrop-union/src/lib.rs
+++ b/nodrop-union/src/lib.rs
@@ -25,10 +25,20 @@ extern crate core as std;
 use std::ops::{Deref, DerefMut};
 
 #[allow(unions_with_drop_fields)]
+#[derive(Copy)]
 union UnionFlag<T> {
     value: T,
 }
 
+impl<T: Clone> Clone for UnionFlag<T> {
+    fn clone(&self) -> Self {
+        unsafe {
+            UnionFlag { value: self.value.clone() }
+        }
+    }
+}
+
+#[derive(Copy, Clone)]
 pub struct NoDrop<T>(UnionFlag<T>);
 
 impl<T> NoDrop<T> {